Відео

Beautiful! It touches my heart. ❤😊

Not exactly a Paco de Lucia rendition, but i applaud your efforts in performing your own renditions it is not an easy song to perform specially with an alive audience.,well done Sir!!

I liked it. Thank you for posting.

Amazing ❤

Beautiful!

Checking in 2024. I miss you singing this song to Teresa and I on your porch in the summertime. Fly high Doc.

Three gorgeous men making music from the heart. 🥰

Thanks for sharing this and others.

Whow! Super nice Interpretation, cool Riff!! Thanks for sharig!

Mike, you are the best!👍👍👍

A good one by Paul. Sure do miss the guy. Gone way too soon. Great job on the tune, Patty.

Loved it!

My long lost cousin, Phyllis.

Nice! Love the solid guitar and vocals!

Your guitar work has inspired me to put this song back in the rotation. Well done.

There is quite a variety of elevation changes going on, and they are more than enough to cast serious doubt on a case that sea levels are even increasing.

Excellent work here. The late Nils Axel Morner was the greatest sea level expert of the last 60 years, and he has stated that a sea level rise of half a meter or more by 2100 is in his words "ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE". He says the most likely sea level rise by that time is 100mm plus or minus 150mm.

Given that science tells us there is a lag of several decades on sea level rise as a result of rising CO2 levels, we are at the part of the hockey stick curve on sea level rise where it still looks flat

Nicely done

Good voice.

Feels good to hear Monte's voice again! RIP

March 2020 update: A summary table of all of the NOAA data is available for download at the website given at the end of this video. All of the data used (365 stations) gives a mean of 1.40mm/yr with a standard deviation of 2.45mm/yr. All data with 75+ years history (as in the video)(125 stations) gives a mean of 0.34mm/yr with a Std.Dev of 2.68mm/yr. All data with 75+ years history but removing all negative rates (46 stations) gives a mean of 1.62mm/yr with a Std.Dev. of 0.83mm/yr. This removes relative rising land areas/sea level drops while still allowing relative sinking land areas / sea level rises, alleviating suspected eustasy bias while allowing high-side sea level rise concerns. This non-model-driven non-satellite data basically shows that there is nothing new here. Sea level rise has been the normal state of the Earth's surface since the last glacial maximum was reached approximately 21,000 years ago, with sea level rise rates varying between 0.5mm/yr and 30mm/yr.. Based on geologic data, in the last +/-7,000 years sea level has risen approximately 7m, averaging 1mm/yr but varying between 0.5mm/yr and 2mm/yr (sea level rose +/- 120m in the +/-14,000 years before that). The statistics above are well within the uncertainties of this most recent geologic range; in fact, if relative sea level declines are allowed (as in the second statistic above), Earth may be exhibiting a below average rate of sea level rise.

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR BEING HONEST AND SHOWING REAL PUBLISHED DATA !!! NOT CHANGED/ALTERED/IMPROVED DATA LIKE WE SEE IN THE NEWS TO FIT THEIR AGENDA!!!---- AGAIN, THANK YOU!!

Sea level rise is a decoy issue, the real problem is deforestation for paper products but no one is talking about that. I wonder why, could it be because a lot of corporations are making out like bandits and don't want the protest movement to get in their faces like they used to. Even though before the fires finished off what was left in Australia we had cut down 97.3% of the trees to make way for grazing land so we could make hamburgers.

it confirms my view of us still handling the unknown like they did in the middle Ages with the difference of having cell phones, refrigerators, planes and automobiles. The Amazon fire is the same style of news quality we face in so many subjects. The Satellite does not only take pics of the amazon. Africa is cut away. It burns at the rate of 2 to 3 there. Any discussion about it or action taken? Stirring up fear of the young and hardworking taxpayers is communist and dictatorial regime style. Democracy and freedom is a gift our ancestors, it has been paid with blood. Hidden politicians should be treated unrespect fully as they do or be fined accordingly. What about those who were miscredited or dismissed telling us this years ago?

For a start, completely wrong assumption the slr is equally spread over planet. The gravitational effect of onland ice on the sea have been studied, and eg the Dutch don't have to worry about Greenland melting, because the gravitational effect of Greenland's ice is already keeping sea levels in N Atlantic high. It will lessen as Greenland melts. But Antarctica, on the other hand....

Hey Jeff - Adam here, checking out your music. Love it!!!

Can't we just cherry pick the ones were the level goes down? I think you are being too alarmist here showing the other ones ...

Still listening Doc. I miss the nights of music and bullshitting in the summertime. Still waters and warm sunshine wherever you are sir ♥️

It's great to see a comprehensive look at local tide gage data, but it is all European. What about the rest of the world? Could it be that decreases in tide gages could be due to local land subsidence? This isn't discussed in this video. The Alps are rising because the African plate is sliding under the European plate, which is basically tilting the northern and western parts of the European plate down. Chew on that a while.

Mike, yours is the best rendition of this song I’ve ever heard! Thank you my friend!

Been missing hearing you sing. I hope some day to play beside you in Colorado.

Bullshit. Learn the fucking song properly or don't do it at all. Have some respect for Mose Allison.

Oh Doc! I am so grateful to hear your voice again! I miss you my beautiful brother!!! I will always & forever love you up to the sky & back a million times!!! 😘💜❤💜❤💜

RIP Monte - still miss you at the coffee shop. I could have listened to you the entire evening any time. Thanks for your music and inspiration.

This is shoreline displacement and not sea level. If you want to see the sea level trends for each station you have to take the isostasy into account and not just eustasy. Please revise your presentation accordingly for each station and post it again.

I think this is fantastic. It deserves many more views and a lot more likes. I'm quoting this video as often as I can :)

Bonne reprise .

Yes! I did a less thorough exercise with raw tide data about 7 years back and got the same linear results. I included Newlyn on the basis it is presumably related to stable Cornish granite. I found the data on a global oceanographic organization's website ( can't remember where) and interestingly the datum level was a bizarre height of minus 6metres or whatever. Anyway, a great demonstration here of direct common sense use of raw 'uncorrected' data !

OK - Lets get some proper science on why Canada, Scandinavia and northern Europe sea/tides are level if not falling. It's about the land, not the sea, and all the local measurements are relative, not absolute. The earths crust is locally rising due to the lack of ice that was once 1-3 miles thick in the last ice age has been gone for 10K years. Much of the northern UK is rising because of the same reason. Exactly the same effect is now detectable in Greenland. Also - gravity itself decreases locally as the ice disappears and the local earth mass is reduced slightly.

Linear extrapolation. Wow, good job, did you learn that in excel class? You ignored the feedback effects and basically all the physics involved in the projections by actual scientists. Just drawing a linear trendline and ignoring the details of the problem tells us absolutely nothing.

I expected to see some graphics from the horn of Africa too.

billiant cover have you got any tabs for this lovely piece of music.

Margaret! I love your song and the way you sing it! I so wish you were here in Chicago making music with us. Be thee well, beautiful songstress.

Very..Very nice.. Thank you "sir"...

AWESOME! . . .BIG THUMBS UP!

Excellent. Im sending this to a couple people. This also coincides with my 50 year experience. Of all samples though most are trending up. Is this a larger event such as a declining ice age, plate tectonics, or what???

Geez Byron, all that talent and just one song on YT.

Excellent!

Very nice video, Tom! Please tell me if I understand it correctly. From eyeballing the graphs, it appears that: 1. Zero on the vertical axis for each tide gauge graph is where the linear trendline was in year 2000. 2. You've assumed a current/to-date global average rate of coastal sea-level rise of about 1.8 mm/year (i.e., IPCC numbers). (Or maybe 1.75 mm/yr?) 3. The difference between the assumed global rate of 1.8 mm/yr and the current local/relative rate of SLR (NOAA's figures, shown for each tide gauge) is assumed to be effect of local factors (mainly vertical land motion), which are very nearly linear and so should not be expected to change significantly over the next 84 years. (I'm going to call this difference "VLM etc.") 4. The 1m and 1.8m projections for year 2100 for each tide gauge are determined by adjusting the global projected values (1.0 and 1.8 meters) by "VLM etc." So, for example, at North Shields, where the measured local rate of SLR is 1.9 mm/yr, the "VLM etc." is 1.9 - 1.8 = +0.1 mm/yr, so the "1.0 m projection" is actually at 1.0 + (100 x 0.1 / 1000) = 1.01m on the vertical axis. Likewise, at Oslo, where the measured local rate of SLR is -3.2 mm/yr, the "VLM etc." is -3.2 - 1.8 = -5.0 mm/yr, so the "1.0 m projection" is actually at 1.0 + (100 x -5.0 / 1000) = 0.5m on the vertical axis. Is that all correct? _Note:_ the IPCC's 1.8 mm/yr global SLR number is inflated by about 0.3 mm/yr model-derived Glacial Isostatic Ajustment (GIA), from its true number, which is just under 1.5 mm/yr. However, that does *not* distort your projections, because the alarmists' "1.0 meter" and "1.8 meter" prophesies also include that GIA.